Blind date with a book – A Turtle Stranger

I am nearing the end of my Blind Date With a Book subscription (boo!) and I just finished up my second last book to come through which is a classic, The Talented Mr Ripley. The name was familiar and I have since found out that there is a well-known movie which might be why, but I haven’t seen it yet which is probably for the best as I normally prefer books to the movies, or at least starting with the book.

On first appearances, it is a relatively small book so I thought it would be a light read. If you are familiar with the storyline you know ‘light read’ isn’t exactly the genre Patricia Highsmith was going for.

To give Highsmith credit though, despite the heavy subject matter, it is a relatively upbeat read. Despite the morbid nature of the stalker/ serial killer protagonist, there isn’t much darkness to the storyline. Despite some very brutal murders, you still remain connected to the protagonist.

This is one of those books though where you don’t know where your sympathy feels, or which character you should be rooting for. None of the characters are particularly likeable or provoke warm feelings in the reader.

I got through the book pretty easily, but I think that might be down to the low page number. I didn’t think there was enough storyline to keep me interested if the book went on for much longer. It was definitely good to try a bit of a different genre, and I would be very interested in watching the movie as well to see how they portray the characters and to see if I feel more sympathy / affection for all of them, but otherwise I wouldn’t rush back to read this book again, or another of Highsmith’s.

Overall, it’s a solid read and I ended up giving it 3 out of 5 on Goodreads. It is probably worth a 3.5 but until Goodreads introduces the half star measure I will continue rounding down to 3. If you are looking for something a bit different then I would definitely recommend it!

I have some fantastic friends who know just what I want in my life, and this year for my birthday they treated me to a book subscription with ‘Blind Date With a Book’. For those who haven’t heard of this, the concept is that a book is wrapped in brown paper and on the outside is a few choice words that would describe that book. The idea is that you buy a book based on how it is described in a few words, rather than knowing about it. What my friends got me is just a book subscription version of that, so for the next 6 months I will be receiving a new suprise book every month. The great thing about a service like this as well is that you can choose the genres that you can receive. You can choose up to 5 genres from the list, or just choose ‘Suprise Me’ where you could end up with anything.

When making my choice, i decided to go with the ‘Suprise Me’ option because I figured if the books were going to be a suprise anyway, it might be a good opportunity to expand my reading repertoire and explore some new things.

I received my first book this week, and it was Rivers of London, the first in the series by Ben Aaronovitch. I had seen this book before and had nearly bought it but something about it just didn’t catch me so I decided to leave it so I thought it was great that I would get the opportunity to read it now.

The premise of this series (without giving anything away) is that a young cop gets brought into a world of fantasy and magic living in modern day London. He joins a team that investigates mystical crimes including for ghosts, river spirits, vampires and anything also fantastical that you can think of. It is basically Sherlock Holmes crossed with Line of Duty crossed with Harry Potter.

I think the premise of this book has some merit, however I didn’t love the execution. I think the author was trying to string the author along and allude to things that might resurface later in the book or series without explaining them, but all it felt like to me was that they were trying to drop hints on ideas that the author wasn’t able to explain or properly weave into the story, and it just leaves you feeling unsatisfied and confused about what the purpose of including it was. Having finished the book now, I am sure that a lot of the references were not important, so I think Aaronovitch would have benefited from just not including these hints at all.

Even the things that he did properly include and elaborated on more didn’t make sense. He talks about river spirits and I still can’t figure out how they work or how they are different to normal people or how their family structures work.

At the same time, there was so many storylines going on at once and I had hoped that they would all intertwine in the end and make sense, and Aaronovitch did try and do that in a sense, but in the end, it just felt rushed and forced. I would compare it to when you read Harry Potter and you get to points where you just go ‘A-ha’ and have to acknowledge Rowling’s mastery in that she had that whole thing planned out in her head from the start. This story really lacked that, and just seemed to be lots of things thrown together at the last minute.

I think the premise of the story is good and I obviously enjoyed it enough to finish it in 3 days, but I don’t think I would return for any more of his stories. Maybe this story could become an interesting movie?

I give Rivers of London 2.5 out of 5 stars.